homeaboutcontact
 
Showing posts with label FAQ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FAQ. Show all posts

Monday, July 16, 2012

FAQ: What Is A Conservatorship And When Is It Necessary?



What are conservatorships? In California and other states, all adults are considered capable of handling their own affairs unless a Judge determines otherwise. In California, this legal arrangement is called a conservatorship.  Conservatorships are established for impaired adults, mot often older people. Adults who are developmentally disabled or the victims of a catastrophic illness or accident may also have a conservatorship. We work with families in filing for conservatorship, opposing meritless petitions and other litigation surrounding conservatorships. We also work on the planning stage to address these issues in advance.

Conservatorship of the Person

A conservatorship of the person is a court case in which a Judge appoints a responsible person or organization (known as a conservator) to care for another adult who cannot care for him or herself (known as a conservatee). Anyone - a parent, spouse, child, other relative, or friend of the adult - can apply for a conservatorship. The two most common type of probate conservatorships are general and limited. LPS conservatorships are used to care for adults with serious mental health illnesses and they must be started by a local government agency. 
Once you are appointed conservator, it becomes your legal responsibility to provide care for the conservatee's daily needs. Therefore, it is important to consider less demanding alternatives to conservatorship. The convservatorships must be filed in the county in which the person resides.  

When Conservatorship is Necessary

Establishing a conservatorship is a formal legal proceeding and involves several steps. Some adults who are concerned about possible future mental and physical incapacity decide to establish a power of attorney or a trust, in part so they can avoid the court action. They choose an individual or an institution to make decisions for them if they become impaired. These are private arrangements and must be made while the person has full mental capacity. 
In California, courts do not routinely monitor powers of attorney or trusts. Most people do not make these arrangements probably because it is difficult to think about becoming incapacitated mentally or physically. For those who have not made prior arrangements, or if the person handling the power of attorney or trust is incapable, or a controversy arises as to their services, a conservatorship may become necessary.

After a Conservatorship is Established

Management of Wealth and Property

When a conservatorship is established, the Judge will require that a bond be obtained equal to the combined value of the liquid assets and annual income in the person's estate. Liquid assets include bank accounts and stocks. A bond is like an insurance policy. If the conservator mishandles the money or takes it, the person in conservatorship can be reimbursed.
The Judge also schedules the case for Court monitoring of the finances and property of the person in conservatorship as well as his or her welfare. The law requires that an Inventory and Appraisal of all assets be filed within 90 days of the appointment of the conservator. The conservator must also file a General Plan for the conservatorship. If the conservatee has any real property, the conservator must record evidence of the conservatorship with The Recorder of the City and County of San Francisco.

One Year Review

One year after the appointment of the conservator and every two years thereafter, an accounting of the assets, including the income and the expenditures must be filed with the Court. The accounting is reviewed in detail by a probate examiner. An investigator personally interviews the individual in conservatorship periodically and determines if the conservator is acting properly.

Non-Family Conservators

There are times when family members are unavailable or incapable of serving as conservators. Occasionally, the person who is thought to need a conservator does not want a family member to be the conservator. In those situations, there are agencies and individuals that can serve. The Public Guardian is an agency of the City and County of San Francisco and is the conservator in the largest number of non-family cases. There are also non-profit agencies that have complied with the law and can be appointed to serve as conservators. In addition there are individuals who are available to serve. They are called private professional conservators. As of July 1, 2008, they must be licensed by the State of California and meet ongoing educational requirements. All professional conservators are expected to keep a case and provide services even if the money runs out, especially if they have been appointed to serve as conservator of the person.
All conservators and attorneys in a conservatorship case are entitled to request the Court for fees for their work. The fees are carefully reviewed and granted by the Probate Court only if they have been properly justified. Conservators and attorneys cannot take money without a formal court order.

Those Most in Need of Conservatorship

Conservatorships affect mainly older people, especially those over 85 years of age. Coincidentally, the fastest growing age group in the United States is the one over 85 years of age. In California, that age group will increase by 143 percent between 1990 and 2020. Some counties will experience even higher rates, up to 400 percent. The influence of the 85 and older age group will emerge most strongly between 2030 and 2040 as the first of the baby boomers reaches 85 years of age (http://www.aging.ca.gov).
With the right genes, healthy living, and luck, most people will escape being incapacitated. However, many Californians will have impairments and will need help with daily living. Most likely the number of conservatorships will increase over time. Fortunately, the California legislature has mandated many court safeguards for those who need conservatorships.

Posted by Henry (Hank) J. Moravec, III, a partner at Moravec, Varga and Mooney, A Partnership. For a free 30 minute consultation (telephonic or in person), you can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210 or (818) 769-4221.
The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/. The firm has two offices and consultations and meetings can be held at either office. There is ample free parking adjacent to the firm's offices.

The San Gabriel Valley office is located at 2233 Huntington Drive, Suite 17, San Marino, California 91108.

The San Fernando Valley office is located at 4605 Lankershim Boulevard, Suite 718, North Hollywood, California 91602-1878.




Friday, April 15, 2011

FAQ: How Do I Reduce The Potential For Probate Litigation While I Am Planning My Estate And Trust?


We have seen an increase in probate litigation in our practice. Perhaps this is due to the economy and shrinking real estate values in California. Even when litigation is necessary, and we have had to aggressively defend our clients or trustees -- we know that litigation can be costly, time-consuming and destructive to family relationships.

Accordingly, I wrote a post a couple of years ago addressing the question of how to reduce the risk of litigation in the estate and trust context during the planning stage. Although these methods are not guaranteed ways of avoiding litigation and every estate plan is different -- the ideas here are useful starting points to consider in the estate planning stage.

Here are six methods to reduce the potential for litigation:

1. Advise Inheritors of Inheritance Plans. Especially when children of the decedent are treated unequally, will contests and litigation arise from disappointed feelings of entitlement. Telling the children ahead of time what their shares will be may avoid a later dispute. One could enter into a contract (for consideration or something of value) with such a person that he or she will not object to the validity of the document. Be careful however, that advising a child that he or she will not receive an equal share may have adverse effects even if it prevents litigation after death. Thus, informing inheritors of the plans could cause family problems in the present. This will vary from family to family.

2. Use a Revocable Trust in Lieu of a Will. Since a revocable trust can be funded and operate during lifetime, it is difficult to contest on the grounds that the individual was unaware of its terms. When the Settlor of the trust dies, there is no need to begin a court proceeding to "prove" the validity of the trust, such as there is for a will.

3. Use an Irrevocable Trust in Lieu of a Will or Revocable Trust. An irrevocable trust is even less likely, in my experience, to be challenged than a revocable trust. Irrevocable trusts can be drafted in such a way so that transfers of property to them are not completed gifts. However, there are other risks and issues with irrevocable trusts that must be considered.

Alternatively, making a transfer that is a completed gift, paying gift tax, and filing a gift tax return disclosing details may be additional evidence that the transfer was truly intended. Again, I believe that a lifetime trust that is significantly funded is less likely to be challenged.

4. Use a Disinheritance Or No Contest Clause. If the testator lives in a state such as California that will enforce it under certain circumstances, a disinheritance clause (also called an in terrorem clause for the Latin word "in fear") could be used. The goal here is to prevent beneficiaries from causing a legal ruckus after the testator is gone. A lot of trust and estate litigation is not about the validity of the document, it is about its interpretation or about actions taken by the fiduciary. In order to reduce this type of litigation, a disinheritance clause can cause a forfeiture of a beneficiary's interest if such a challenge is made. The entire estate plan must be consistent with this clause.

With the advent of passage of Senate Bill 1264 which enacts Probate Code Sections 21310-21315 effective January 1, 2010, California's "no contest" law has been significantly weakened. This weakening affects wills and trusts that became irrevocable after January 1, 2001 and later. "No contest" clauses traditionally penalize parties who attempt to attack a will or a trust. Now, it will be significantly easier to attack a will or a trust in California.

5. Use Mediation or Arbitration Provisions. Arbitration or mediation cannot be used with respect to the challenge of a document's validity unless the parties agree to it. Using a disinheritance clause to cause forfeiture if the parties will not participate can be used. This could stop claims that are filed only to harass other beneficiaries or to delay distributions to others. Another approach would be having the parties enter into a contract agreeing to arbitration before the transfer.

6. Use a Condition Precedent to a Bequest as an Alternative Method of Causing Participation in Mediation or Arbitration. Since a person cannot be forced to participate in arbitration or mediation unless the law provides for enforcement, consideration must be given to how to get parties to use these methods. One can use the carrot instead of the stick. Parties can be given a benefit if they consent to use arbitration or mediation instead of resorting to court.

When creating estate plans or trust documents it is important to consider the potential for litigation and whether it should be addressed prior to the death or after the death of the people creating it. While much can be done prior to death to resolve potential disputes and keep communications open, often issues only arise after the death of the trustees. During the estate planning stage, this is the time for you to consider what can be done to reduce the likelihood of estate and trust litigation.


Posted by Henry (Hank) J. Moravec, III, a partner at Moravec, Varga & Mooney, A Partnership. For a free 30 minute consultation (telephonic or in person), you can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210 or (818) 769-4221.


With respect to probate, Hank Moravec has over 20 years' experience as one of the best Los Angeles probate attorneys and Los Angeles probate litigation attorneys and is available should you need legal advice regarding your own or a family member's situation. For a consultation, You can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210 or (818) 769-4221 to request a consultation.


The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/. The firm has two offices and consultations and meetings can be held at either office.


The San Gabriel Valley office is located at 2233 Huntington Drive, Suite 17, San Marino, California 91108. There is ample free parking adjacent to the firm's office.

The San Fernando Valley office is located at
4605 Lankershim Boulevard, Suite 718, North Hollywood, California 91602-1878.

Friday, August 20, 2010

FAQ: Do I Need To Hire A Probate Lawyer? What Is Probate Court Litigation?

Do I Need To Hire A Probate Litigation Lawyer?

If you think you need a probate lawyer, it's probably because a relative or someone close to you has passed away (called the "decedent"). This is not an easy time to try to find a lawyer, but it must be done.

If you're involved in a lawsuit over an estate -- or if you think you may end up in a lawsuit -- look for a probate attorney who also handles litigation. There are basically three types of probate lawyers:
(1) those who only handle the administrative side of probates and drafting of will, trust and estate documents (who can loosely be called transactional lawyers);
(2) those who only represent clients in fights over who gets the estate (called probate litigators); and
(3) those estate and trust firms which do both.

Our firm, for example, does both. If you anticipate litigation, it is not a good idea to hire only a transactional attorney since at some point you will need to bring in another attorney who will need to get up to speed and this can increase your or the estate's legal fees. A probate litigation attorney may also be better at positioning you or the estate for the anticipated lawsuit.

A related question is what is probate court litigation?

What Is Probate Court Litigation?

Probate Court is the court that handles matters concerning wills and estates, such as the distribution of property or money to those named in a will. In California, the Probate Court also handles guardianships and conservatorships.

The terms “contested matters” and “litigation” are often used interchangeably. Both refer to situations that may require the Probate Court's action to resolve a dispute or fix a problem. Some contested matters do not involve animosity between the parties, while others do. If the matter surfaces because of a person's death or mental incapacity, then any necessary court proceeding will usually be filed in a court that has “probate jurisdiction.” Most of the matters handled by probate courts, such as admitting wills to probate and appointing executors, are routine and not contested.

Routine probate matters can be handled very efficiently. “Contested matters” handled by probate courts (also known as “probate court litigation”) is a broad term that includes a variety of situations, including, but not limited to:
■ Will contests (a challenge to the validity of a will);
■ Will and trust construction suits (a request that the Probate Court make a determination regarding the legal meaning or effect of particular wording used in a will or trust);
■ Guardianship contests. An example includes a fight over:
(1) whether a guardian should be appointed for a particular individual who allegedly has lost his mental capacity (and did not do any advance planning, such as executing powers of attorney), and (2) if so, who should be appointed as the guardian to make medical decisions and handle financial matters for that mentally incapacitated person);
■ Trust modification and trust reformation suits. This is a proceeding that requests the Probate Court to change (or "fix") the terms of a trust because something is wrong with the way the trust is worded);
■ Trust termination suits. This is a legal action brought to terminate a trust because the purpose of the trust has been fulfilled or can no longer be fulfilled; and
■ Breach of fiduciary duty actions. These are lawsuits by beneficiaries against an executor, trustee, guardian, or agent alleging that the fiduciary failed to act in accordance with the law and/or the instrument appointing her and thereby caused damage to the beneficiaries).

Needless to say, the best way to prevent most probate litigation is by good planning. Good planning is what estate planning is all about. We will address ways to prevent probate litigation in other articles in this blog. The old statement "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure" is especially true in estate planning and probate litigation. All litigation, however, cannot be prevented even with excellent planning. In those circumstances, you need a probation litigation attorney.

Posted by Henry (Hank) J. Moravec, III, a partner at Moravec, Varga and Mooney, A Partnership.
For a free 30 minute consultation (telephonic or in person), you can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210.

He focuses his practice on Estate Planning, Trust and Probate Administration, Beneficiary and Trustee Representation, Probate Litigation, Tax Law, and Nonprofit Law. He represents clients throughout Southern California and his offices are conveniently located for clients in the Los Angeles, Santa Barbara, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties.

With respect to probate, Hank Moravec has over 20 years' experience in Los Angeles and is available should you need legal advice regarding your own or a family member's situation.

The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/.
The Los Angeles area office is located at 2233 Huntington Drive, Suite 17, San Marino, California 91108. There is ample free parking adjacent to the firm's office.



Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Estate Planning For Your Pet?

Estate Planning For Your Pet?
Most of the articles we write are about protecting one's family, loved ones and children. However, there is the issue of what happens when our pets outlive us. For many, their pets are part of their families. Some pets, like parrots and horses, have long life-spans.

Last year, I wrote an article entitled: "Frequently Asked Questions About Including Provisions For Pets In Trusts." This article (which I am reposting for the convenience of our readers) addresses the statutory framework for pet trusts in California.

In July 2008, California's permissive pet trust statute was amended with a more modern statute with enforceable provisions. See California Probate Code Section 15212. As pet owners, we can certainly relate to some of our clients' wishes to plan for the future care of their pets.

California Probate Code Section 15212

Here is a summary of this relatively new statute:

■ A trust for the care of an animal is deemed to be for a "lawful noncharitable purpose."

■ "Animal" is broadly defined to include pets of any type as well as domestic animals.

■ The trust terminates when the last animal dies that was alive when the settlor died (unless the settlor provided otherwise in the trust instrument).

■ The court must liberally construe the trust. Extrinsic evidence is admissible to ascertain the settlor's intent.

■ Trust funds may be used only for the benefit of the animal unless the trust instrument provides otherwise.

■ When the trust ends, the balance of the trust property passes (1) according to the terms of the trust (i.e., to the remainder beneficiaries), (2) if none and the settlor created the trust in a non-residuary will clause, under the residuary clause, or (3) in other cases, to the settlor's heirs.

■ The settlor may name a trust enforcer in the trust. The court may appoint a trust enforcer.

■ Anyone interested in the welfare of the animal and any nonprofit charitable organization that has as its principal activity the care of animals may petition the court to enforce the trust.

■ If the settlor did not name a trust or if the named trust is unable or unwilling to serve, the court must appoint a trustee.

■ Accountings must be given to the remainder beneficiaries (or those who would take upon the death of the animal) as well as to any nonprofit charitable corporation that has as its principal activity the care of animals and has made a written request for accountings.

■ Trusts with property valued at $40,000 or less are exempt from accountings, filings, reportings, and other requirements which normally apply to trusts under California law.

■ Upon a reasonable request, the animal and the trust records may be inspected by any beneficiary, the trust enforcer, or a nonprofit charitable corporation that has as its principal activity the care of animals.

How An Estate Planning Attorney Can Help You

As noted above, the laws of the state of California allow for trusts for the care of pets or domestic animals for the life of the animal. We will work with you to design the legal documents to take advantage of these laws for your pet’s protection. Proper planning can provide for the care of your pets not only in the event of death, but also for incapacity or temporary emergencies. Planning can lead to peace of mind, so you can rest assured that your pets will be cared for in the way that you desire.

You can provide directions regarding your pet’s medical conditions, health care, exercise needs, dietary needs, preferred veterinarian, and burial. Provisions for immediate access to your home for caregivers can be made. You can also appoint a different person to oversee the ongoing care of your pets to ensure that the caregiver is treating your pet in the manner that you set out in the trust.

Posted by Henry (Hank) J. Morevec III. With respect to estate planning and pets, Hank Moravec has over 20 years' experience as an estate and trust attorneys and can tailor trusts to suit your particular situation.   He is also a devoted pet owner and understands the needs of his clients to take care of their pets in their estate planning.

For a free 30 minute consultation, you can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210 to request a consultation. The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/. The firm is located at 2233 Huntington Drive, Suite 17, San Marino, California 91108. There is ample free parking adjacent to the firm's office.

The office is located in San Marino, California, a suburb of Los Angeles in the San Gabriel area located 20 minutes from downtown Los Angeles. The firm represents clients throughout California and its attorneys engage in sophisticated estate planning for clients throughout Southern California.

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Why Do I Need A Written Estate Plan?


In California, everyone has an estate plan even if they have no Will or Trust. That is because California law provides a detailed scheme of who is entitled to your property when you die. However, very few people would be happy with the results under the law because the law does not take into account an individual's wishes or family situation.

Regardless of who you are, how much money you have, who you want to inherit your estate or when you want them to receive distribution, your wishes are likely very different from the basic disposition provided under California state statutes. For instance, if both spouses ultimately die from a common accident but one outlives the other, even for a short time, all of the property of both spouses could go to the survivor's family rather than be split between the heirs of both spouses.

Having no estate plan can also be a problem for those with minor children. For example, if a couple with children died, California law provides that the children would be entitled to full ownership of the property, including any businesses, at age 18. Most people consider age 18 far too young an age to receive a full inheritance.

However, with a well thought out Estate Plan you can make sure that your children are well cared for (food, clothing and schooling) by a responsible adult trustee and that your minor children receive their inheritance at an age when they are more mature and less likely to blow through their inheritance on frivolous items.

Proper estate planning is important as a means of avoiding Probate Court. When you die without a Will or with a Will but no Trust, your heirs are required to bring the matter to Probate Court. Until such time as someone is appointed by the Probate Court, your assets are frozen and your heirs are unable to access your accounts to pay any bills and expenses.

In addition to being costly, Probate Court is time consuming and many acts require Probate Court approval. Even the most basic of estates can take over one year to close. Moreover, all documents filed in Probate Court are fully accessible by the public.

Another pitfall with the no estate plan philosophy is that lack of clarity most often breeds disputes and heirs tend to fight over the smallest of estates. These disputes are expensive to litigate and the fees incurred by the estate come from the estate's assets.

A properly drafted Will and Trust can avoid both the application of California's default provisions, as well as unnecessary expenses and the inconveniences of Probate Court. Not only does this keep the estate administration private, but it ensures that your wishes are followed and done so in a timely fashion.

We encourage you to contact an experienced estate planning lawyer to create an estate plan or to review your existing estate plan and determine whether changes should be made. For a complimentary 30 minute telephonic or in-person consultation, you can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210.

Most sophisticated estate planning attorneys, such as our firm, quote a flat fee and there are no products being sold or conflicts of interest in advising you on the best estate plan for you and your family. Refer to my prior post on "What Does Estate Planning Cost?" for information about our firm's flat fees for estate plans.

Posted by Henry J. Moravec, III. Henry (Hank) Moravec is a partner at Moravecs, A Professional Law Corporation, and is a very experienced Los Angeles estate planning attorney, Los Angeles trust attorney and Los Angeles probate attorney. He has more than 20 years' experience in estate planning and is extremely dedicated to his clients and helping them create a plan that is tailored to their wishes, finances, helps avoid probate and takes into account their families' unique situation.

The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/. The firm is located at 2233 Huntington Drive #17, San Marino, CA 91108. There is ample free parking adjacent to the firm's office.
The firm is a boutique estates and trust law practice specializing only in Estate Planning, Probate, Trust Administration, Beneficiary and Trustee Representation, Tax Law, and Nonprofit Law. The office is located in San Marino, California, a suburb of Los Angeles in the San Gabriel area located 20 minutes from downtown Los Angeles. The firm represents clients throughout California and its attorneys appears in probate court throughout Southern California

Friday, July 2, 2010

Advance Health Care Directives: L.A.Times Article On California Program That Helps People Record Wishes At End Of Life


Part of our basic estate plan is helping our clients draft Advance Health Care Directives. The Advance Health Care Directive identifies the individuals that you desire to act for you if you become unable to make medical decisions for yourself.

The most common decision involves when, and under what circumstances, extraordinary measures should be used to prolong life. There are also sections of the Advanced Health Care Directive which deal with whether or not you desire to be an organ donor. This is part of our basic estate plan package.

On July 2, 1010, the Los Angeles Times had an article entitled "California program helps people record wishes at end of life." This article is about a program used in California to help nursing home and terminally ill patients express their wishes regarding treatment at the end of life.

Efforts to increase awareness about the program are being led in California by the Coalition for Compassionate Care of California and the California HealthCare Foundation. Information and opportunities to learn about the program can also be found on this web site.
The program is called Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) and has been adopted in many nursing homes, hospitals and long-term care facilities in California beginning in January, 2009. The program involves an innovative medical form, that is signed by a doctor, allowing patients to specify what kind of care they want at the end of life, such as feeding tubes and other medical interventions. The form was designed 20 years ago in Oregon because of concerns that traditional Do Not Resuscitate orders and advanced directives do not fully communicate patients' wishes for many situations and types of treatments.
POLST forms are different that advanced health care directives. However, advanced health care directives can help your family members complete the POLST forms in the event that you are incapacitated and are evidence of your intentions. Here are sample POLST forms in a variety of languages.
POLST forms address when and if there should be (1) cardiopulmonary resuscitation when the person has no pulse is not breathing or if there should be a DNR [do not resuscitate]; (2) medical interventions when the person has pulse and/or is breathing ranging from only comfort, limited interventions (such as IV or antibiotics) or full treatment (intubation, defribillation, intensive care); and (3) artificially administered nutrition. This form can be modified at any time as long as there is capacity. When there is not capacity, the advance health care directive can demonstrate intent. POLST forms are signed by the physician at the hospital.
In order to prepare for determining your intentions, I would suggest that you read an Advanced Health Care Directive or read the information available on these websites, and think about the following questions:

(1) Who do you want to make health care decisions for you when you can't make them?

(2) What kind of medical treatment do you want or don't want?

(3) How comfortable you want to be?

(4) How do you want people to treat you?

(5) What would you want your loved ones to know about your health condition?

It is an excellent idea for those executing Advance Health Care Directives to speak openly and honestly with the person or persons they designate and go through the different situations that might come up. While no one can anticipate every medical situation, a thoughtful and reasoned discussion can cover the more likely scenarios.

Posted by
Henry (Hank) J. Moravec, III, a partner at Moravec, Varga and Mooney. For a complimentary 30 minute consultation (telephonic or in person), you can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210.

He focuses his practice on Estate Planning, Trust and Probate Administration, Beneficiary and Trustee Representation, Probate Litigation, Tax Law, and Nonprofit Law. He represents clients throughout Southern California and his offices are conveniently located for clients in the Los Angeles, Orange, Santa Barbara, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties.

The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/. The firm's office is located at 2233 Huntington Drive, Suite 17, San Marino, California 91108. Telephone: (626) 793-3210.


Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Forbes Article "Six Estate Planning Questions For Women" Highlights Unique Issues Women Face In Estate Planning


Forbes Magazine has a useful article "Six Estate Planning Questions For Women" by Deborah Jacobs. It is worth a read even if you have an estate plan since it highlights some facts that are easy to overlook. The article addresses that fact that estate planning can be more important for women.

One reason is that of Americans 65 and older, 42% of women are widowed but only 14% of men are widowed. In addition, women typically have a longer life expectancy, a tendency to marry older men, and lower lifetime earnings, meaning that they are more likely than men to see their living standards compromised if proper estate planning isn’t completed. Further, since women typically live longer, they usually have the last word about which assets go to family, charity, or Uncle Sam.

As the article points out, when considering estate planning, here are six basic questions women should think about:

1. Whom can you trust? Medical advancements enable women to live longer which increases the likelihood of suffering from a diminished mental state - and the need for a durable Power of Attorney.

2. Who would raise your children? You want to prevent a custody battle and the possibility of nobody wanting to take over. See our prior post entitled "15 Important Tips For Picking A Guardian For Your Child Or Children."

3. Do you need life insurance?
Life insurance is a good way to replace lost income or to pay for estate taxes, especially when your estate is made up of illiquid assets.

4. Do you have assets of your own?
You may need to transfer property from one spouse to another or out of joint ownership.

5. Is there money in the bank?
Make sure there is enough money to cover immediate expenses should one spouse pass away. Funds from the deceased spouse’s separate account won’t be available for use right away.

6. Should you shed assets to save taxes?
Make sure you leave yourself enough before you start giving things away.

This article is just a beginning on the issues women need to address in estate planning but it is a good starting point. This is an important time to have your estate plan created or updated due to the uncertainty in estate planning law. See my prior post entitled "Planning For Dormant Estate Tax in 2010. What Happens in 2011. Why You Need To Seek Advice And Have Estate Plan Updated."

Consulting with an experienced estate planning attorney will help you answer these questions and address other questions that are important to you and your family.

Posted by Henry (Hank) J. Moravec, III, a partner at Moravec, Varga & Mooney. For a complimentary 30 minute consultation (telephonic or in person), you can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210 or (818) 769-4221.

He focuses his practice on Estate Planning, Trust and Probate Administration, Beneficiary and Trustee Representation, Probate Litigation, Tax Law, and Nonprofit Law. He represents clients throughout Southern California and his offices are conveniently located for clients in the Los Angeles, Orange, Santa Barbara, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties.

The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/. The firm has two offices and consultations and meetings can be held at either office. The San Gabriel Valley office is located at 2233 Huntington Drive, Suite 17, San Marino, California 91108. Telephone: (626) 793-3210.

The San Fernando Valley office is located at 4605 Lankershim Boulevard, Suite 718, North Hollywood, California 91602-1878. Telephone: (818) 769-4221.

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Planning For Dormant Estate Tax In 2010. What Happens In 2011? Why You Need To Seek Advice And Have Estate Plan Updated.


One reason I like to refer to articles in newspapers is that it helps explain to non-lawyers what is happening in estate and tax law. It also helps remind people when they need to engage in estate planning. The New York Times' article on June 12, 2010 is informative and is entitled "Confusion Over The Dormant Estate Tax Keeps Advisers Busy."

Why might you need to consult an experienced California estate planning attorney?

1. If Congress fails to act again this year, the estate tax laws next year will revert to their levels before 2001 which is $1 million.

This means that if you set up your estate prior to 2010 on the assumption that estates worth more than $1 million but less than $3.5 million or more would not be subject to estates taxes upon death will need to revisit their estate plan.

If the law stays the same and Congress does not act, the heirs of a single person who dies next year with more than $1 million would be subject to a 55 percent tax. (For couples, it is $2 million.) Heirs of that same person, with a $3.5 million estate, would have paid nothing in 2009 but could pay as much as $1.375 million in 2011, depending on the level of planning. The numbers speak for themselves.

2. How Can My Estate Be Worth Over $1 Million?

In California and the Northeast, the value of a home combined with retirement accounts means that a large percentage of the upper-middle class can have estates worth over $1 million (or $2 million for couples).

Estate planning can save a great deal of money and the cost of planning (flat fees in our office ranging from $3,500 to $5,000 for most estates) is minor compared to the savings in estate tax. See our prior article about "What Does Estate Planning Cost?"

3. Some wealthier clients are interested in creating grantor retained annuity trusts (GRATs) which is a short-term trust that allows people to pass money to heirs tax-free. There is a concern that the federal government could change the terms of these trusts. See our prior article about GRATs and other ways of transferring wealth.

4. For 2010, elimination of automatic step-up in basis requires determining the original purchase price and waiting for IRS to issue documents on how to apply artificial step-up in basis.

As discussed in other articles, in 2010 the automatic "step-up" in basis for capital gains tax purposes was also repealed. Here is a brief explanation of how this works. Prior to 2010, the assets of people who died under the old estate tax law were valued at the date of their death for tax purposes. For example, any capital gains on stocks purchased 20 years' earlier — which would have been subject to tax if sold — were erased. In 2010 that is no longer the case, and figuring out what is owed requires determining the original purchase price — however long ago that was.

Without an estate tax this year, the Internal Revenue Code grants an artificial step-up in basis, as it is called, of $1.3 million to be used at the executor’s discretion and $3 million on assets passed to a spouse. The problem is that the IRS has yet to issue documents or forms to record how this exemption has been applied.

For an estate where the deceased passed away in 2010, the tax would not be due until April 15, 2011. However, a problem could arise, for example, if the heirs need to sell stock for cash or to diversity holdings. The sale can be made but the heirs would incur a 15 percent capital gains tax on the appreciated amount.

The New York Times article gave one example showing how not having an automatic step-up in basis could affect property. For example, if an heir inherited a property worth less than $3.5 million (the 2009 exemption) but worth more than the $1.3 million (with a basis near zero) that the IRS step-up in basis would exempt -- there is a large difference between the taxes owed in 2009 and 2010. For a 2009 sale, there would have been no estate tax or capital gains tax owed. But if the property is sold in 2010, capital gains tax would be owed.

5. What do estate planning attorneys want to happen?

I cannot speak for others, but I (and most others I believe) want predictability and certainty in what the tax laws are going to be in 2010 and afterwards. Previously, it was predicted that the estate tax would be enacted retroactively but that has not occurred and may not. Given that the first billionaire has passed away in 2010 and has saved his estate an enormous amount of money, the IRS may not want to litigate against his estate which could easily outspend the IRS.

For the heirs middle-upper class who are moderately wealthy due to property and retirement plans, they will pay significantly more unless Congress acts to change the law. People who would not have had to worry about estate tax will need to plan if Congress changes the law or if Congress allows the tax to revert to 2001 rates.

6. What should I do if my estate is worth more than $1 million (or $2 million for couples)?

You can do a couple of things. First, have your estate plan updated before the end of 2010. There may be gifts and other estate planning vehicles available to you this year.

Second, watch what Congress does and plan to have your estate plan reviewed again in 2011. Depending on your net worth, the types of assets you own and your intended beneficiaries, it might turn out that you will not need the 2011 return visit — but we won't know until Congress acts or fails to act.

Posted by Henry J. Moravec, III. Henry (Hank) Moravec is a partner at Moravecs, A Professional Law Corporation. He has over 20 years' experience as one of the best Los Angeles estate planning attorneys and one of the best Los Angeles probate attorneys with an excellent tax law background and is available should you need legal advice regarding your own situation.

You can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210 to request a consultation. The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/. The firm is located at 2233 Huntington Drive, Suite 17, San Marino, California 91108.

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

How Do You Prepare Your Business For Succession As Part Of Your Estate Plan?


On March 17, 2010, the New York Times had an article entitled "How To Prepare Your Business For Succession." Even though there is no estate tax at the moment in 2010, the article touches on many of the non-tax issues which should be addressed by any family business owner irrespective of its form (corporation, LLC or partnership).

Previously, I wrote on this subject last year on a post entitled "As A Business Owner, What do I Need To Consider When Planning My Estate?"

The article mainly addresses the business related points of how to avoid a succession disaster. It recommends the following ideas:

First, identify your successors. Make an honest assessment. Succession specialists advise business owners to put their possible successors through rigorous outside analysis if possible.

Second, prepare the new successor or boss. If a child or other relative expresses interest in taking over the family business, the owner should set up a formal system of hurdles to make sure the child gets the skills required of any other prospective manager.

Third, deal with crucial employees. One idea given by the article is that to ensure that a new leader does not lose top lieutenants, it can be wise to offer them a percentage of the business. Businesses can be severely harmed when a top employee leaves or a salesperson takes his clients elsewhere.

Fourth, cover your tax exposure by obtaining good estate and tax planning advice.

Although the article covers many of the common issues, it does not even touch upon many of the strictly estate related issues which arise such as how to be fair to children who are not party of the family business and whether or not to take affirmative steps to protect the "inherited" family business from the creditors of children and grandchildren (including for example divorce).

The real challenge here is there is not one right answer. Some children may naturally thrive in the family business and help it grow. Should they not get a larger share of the business than a sibling who had no interest in it? Then some businesses require the children to have a professional license (law, medicine, architecture, etc.) to become a shareholder in the business.

The article deals with if you want your business to continue -- it says these are the things you ought to do. Most family businesses are sold not because they cannot be continued not because they cannot be continued but because the children/heirs do not want to continue and want the cash. That is a different issue that should also be addressed in the planning stages. Each business and family is unique and it is important to have a plan that is tailored to yours.

Posted by Henry J. Moravec, III. Henry (Hank) Moravec is a partner at Moravecs, A Professional Law Corporation. The firm is located at 2233 Huntington Drive #17, San Marino, CA 91108. He is a very experienced Los Angeles estate planning attorney, Los Angeles trust attorney and Los Angeles tax attorney who has more than 20 years' experience in business succession issues in estate planning.

Should you have any questions regarding your own situation, you can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210. The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/

Saturday, March 6, 2010

How Do You Talk To Your Family About Estate Planning?


The New York Times recently had an article entitled "Estate Planning as a Family Conversation" which reminds us how difficult it can be to bring up estate planning, wills and trusts and related financial topics with parents, children and relatives.

Why is it so difficult to have these financial conversations? Whether it is the parents explaining their estate planning to their adult children or those children asking their parents about whether they have enough money to see them through a long retirement - these are touchy conversations.

It may be likely that your parents or you grew up at a time when money was not discussed openly so there may be a discomfort at sharing details of your financial lives with each other. There may be pride and privacy barriers. Other family dynamics can also be at work. Estate planning can be viewed as simultaneously a private topic and a morbid issue. Many years ago, I recall one estate planning meeting with an actress regarding estate planning where I was asked by her manager not to mention the word "death" during any meeting.

The New York Times article mentioned two examples where enduring some uncomfortable moments in initiating estate planning discussions gave the families peace of mind and helped ensure future family harmony. In one example, a vocational consultant in Seattle asked her father, a lawyer specializing in American Indian rights, about his estate plan after learning he had brain cancer. She was surprised to find that her father did not even have a will.

Her father had been separated from his wife for 30 years but had never divorced. Without a will under his state's law, everything he left behind would go to his "wife." The father decided he would rather have his assets divided between their two adult children. Due to this conversation, the father met with a lawyer to discuss the necessary documents to carry out his intention.

In a second example, a mother had decided to leave one adult son a larger inheritance than the others because that son had more children. When the mother shared these details with the son, the son persuaded her that he would rather receive less money than cause any family disharmony or face the wrath of his siblings. As a result, the mother changed her plan so that all her children would receive equal shares.

In future articles, I will discuss different ideas and approaches for parents to share their estate plans with adult children. I will also discuss how adult children can talk to their older parents about their finances and help determine if an estate plan is in place and whether the children will need to support them and when.

How families handle sensitive issues depends both on the particular circumstances and the personalities involved. A bit of advance role playing can help and an experienced estate and trust lawyer can provide guidance. In my experience, and as noted by the New York Times article, it is sometimes better have a series of talks, rather than addressing everything at once. Instead of one giant family meeting, it may be decided to speak to each individual one-on-one.

Five Initial Strategies

Whether you are the adult child or the parent initiating the conversation, here are five strategies to guide you overall during this process. In some cases where there has been no planning, it may be necessary to have the initial conversation to get the other family member to consult with an estate planning attorney and get their affairs in order.

1. Have the right tone. Too much force and the person on the other side of the conversation will focus more on the money side of the discussion rather than the fact that you care about the family and them and want to have this discussion for the right reasons. However, if you are too timid, the other person could attempt to dodge the conversation.

2. Use yourself or your family as an icebreaker to bring up the subject. You can explain how you and your spouse are just going through estate planning, long-term insurance and then ask the relevant follow-up question such as "Is it time for you to update your estate plan?" Or you can state that you want to share your plans with your relative at a convenient time and place. You can also share the story of a friend whose affairs were not in order and what a disaster it was for the family or the friend whose family was torn apart when the estate plan and its reasoning was not known in advance by the adult children.

3. Use current events or recent headlines of a well-known person's death. Use a recent case such as Michael Jackson, Brooke Astor or a recent death of a celebrity as a reminder about how easy it is for us to put these important tasks off until it is too late.

4. If they are more comfortable writing or communicating in writing, think about how to write out your plans or help them write out their plans. While you are talking to your family member, you can pull out some paper and start jotting notes to help them go through this process.

5. Schedule a meeting with an experienced estate planning attorney to get the process moving. There is nothing like a deadline or meeting to get people focused on getting a task (especially potentially sensitive ones) done. Select an experienced estates and trust attorney who has a tax background rather than an insurance agent who is selling life insurance products for commission. One advantage of hiring a California estate planning attorney is that they can help guard against later claims that there was undue influence or lack of mental capacity.

Most sophisticated estate planning attorneys such as our firm quote a flat fee and there are no products being sold or conflicts of interest in advising you on the best estate plan for you and your family. Refer to my prior post on "What Does Estate Planning Cost?" for information about our firm's flat fees for estate plans.

Posted by Henry J. Moravec, III. Henry (Hank) Moravec is a partner at Moravecs, A Professional Law Corporation. He has over 20 years' experience as one of the best Los Angeles estate planning attorneys, Los Angeles probate attorney, Los Angeles trust administration attorney, Los Angeles beneficiary attorney, and Los Angeles trustee attorney with an excellent tax law background and is available should you need legal advice regarding your own situation.

You can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210 to request a consultation. The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/. The firm is located at 2233 Huntington Drive, Suite 17, San Marino, California 91108.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Estate Planning & Annuities: Should Parents Take Smaller Monthly Payments So Survivors Can Receive Some Sort Of Inheritance?


On February 20, 2010, the Wall Street Journal's online edition has an article entitled "A Tough Choice: Your Or Your Kids." The article discusses the dilemma some families face when buying an annuity: Should a parent take smaller monthly payments so that their surviving spouse or children can get some sort of inheritance?

Each person or family's situation is different but the article has several interesting points that can be considered.

1. Have your financial planner work with your estate planning attorney when deciding on how to structure annuities, whether to have a fixed or variable annuity, whether to pair the annuity with an insurance policy and/or whether to purchase riders to guarantee payments for your heirs.

Often times without the input of an estate planning attorney, most people opt for the smaller payment without considering other and possibly better strategies to help the heirs come out ahead, including pairing an annuity with an insurance policy.

2. Pairing an annuity with an insurance policy. The WSJ article gave the example of a certified financial planner who advised an 80-year-old client to use the $266,000 value of a variable life-insurance policy to buy an immediate annuity, providing her with $2,500 a month for the rest of her life. The mother is using $1,500 a month from that $2,500 payment to buy a guaranteed life-insurance policy worth $300,000. Now her son stands to inherit more than the annuity's cost.

The WSJ article gave another example of pairing an annuity with an insurance policy to hedge against inflation. Let's say you and your spouse have $1 million saved at age 65 from which you hope to pull 4% a year. You could spend $185,000 to buy a second-to-die permanent life-insurance policy with a $1 million guarantee that would eventually go to your children. And with about $800,000, you could get an immediate inflation-indexed annuity that would pay $40,750 the first year and continue paying through both spouses' lifetimes.

3. There are two main types of annuities, each usually starting with a lump-sum payment. With variable annuities, you invest in stocks or bonds with an insurance guarantee. There usually are surrender payments if you withdraw the money in the first few years. With immediate fixed annuities, your lump sum buys regular payments from an insurer for the rest of your life. They are being hailed by everybody from financial planners to President Barack Obama as a way for Americans to stretch their retirement nest eggs.

4. Riders to guarantee payments for your heirs or to adjust monthly payments for inflation. Annuities come with complex features and fees that are often not found in investments like mutual funds. It takes careful analysis to figure out if an annuity makes sense for you and, if so, which features to purchase.

When one spouse has health problems and the other could live a long time, variable annuities with guaranteed-minimum payments can pay off, despite annual fees that can top 3.5% of the invested amount. The WSJ gave an example of a 69-year-old retired teacher whose husband died last year from post-polio syndrome. The couple was drawing 6% a year from a variable annuity in which they had invested $300,000. The investment had lost half its value during the financial crisis, but the retired teacher inherited the original amount invested because of a guarantee they had purchased. The money should still be there for her two daughters as well.

5. Immediate fixed annuities are simpler to understand and cheaper: You get a regular payment for life. But when you die, the downside is that your family loses that payment unless you pay extra for a rider returning at least some of the money you invested. The rub is that such a rider will typically lower the monthly payment you receive by anywhere from 2% to 15% or even more.

6. The WSJ article suggested an approach for buying an annuity that involves determining one's basic expenses—utilities, food, taxes, insurance and so on. Purchase a plain-vanilla annuity to cover those costs. Then you can invest the rest of your savings to spend on vacations, cars or grandchildren. Anything left over can be your family's inheritance. As the article pointed out, however, if you are early in retirement, who knows how much the basics will cost in 20 or 30 years? And what if your savings barely cover an annuity that will pay for those basics?

7. As annuities gain in popularity, make sure you consult with an experienced estate and trust lawyer as well as with your financial planner before you purchase the annuity so it is consistent with your estate plan and wishes for providing for your heirs.

Posted by Henry J. Moravec, III. Henry (Hank) Moravec is a partner at Moravecs, A Professional Law Corporation in San Marino, California, a suburb of Los Angeles. He is a very experienced estate planning attorney. Should you have any questions regarding your own situation, you can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210. The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

15 Important Tips For Picking A Guardian For Your Child Or Children

Naming a guardian is a difficult but necessary estate planning tool. While it’s difficult enough to think about not being there to raise your children, imagine a court choosing their guardian with no input from you. Imagine your relatives arguing in court over who gets your children—or having them agree but not on the people you would have chosen. That's why it's important to nominate a guardian while it's still up to you.

In our practice, we find that this is one of the most difficult decisions. In fact, estate plans sometimes get held up because this is the most difficult decision for people to make. Here are some definitions and tips to help you make this decision.

What is a guardian? A guardian is an individual, typically a family member or close friend, who can handle the responsibility of raising your child if you and your spouse (or ex-spouse) die or become severely incapacitated before your kids reach adulthood.

What is a Nomination of Guardians? If a person or couple has minor children it is very important to prepare a Nomination of Guardians to serve if both parents are deceased or incapacitated. A court proceeding in the Family Law court is required to formally approve a guardian but the court affords the written nomination of the parents great weight in making its decision. Guardianship is a court proceeding in which a judge gives someone who is not the parent: custody of a child, or the power to manage the child's property (called "estate"), or both.

Here are 15 tips to help you make your best choice for guardian for your child or children.

1: Think beyond the obvious choices. Make a list of all the people you know who you would trust to take care of your children. You do not need to limit your list to close family members. While siblings and parents can be excellent choices, consider also extended family members who are old enough to raise your children – cousins, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, and others.

2: Friends can make excellent guardians. Beyond family, consider close friends, families with whom your family is close, the families of your children’s friends, friends you know from your place of worship, or other adults with whom you and your children have a special relationship.

3: Do not make the decision solely about the other person's finances or the size of their house. Do not eliminate anyone from consideration because you don’t think they have the financial wherewithal to take care of your children. You can take care of the finances with what you leave. (That's what adequate life insurance is about.) You can even instruct your trustee to provide funds for your chosen guardian to build an addition to their home or move to a larger home to accommodate your children.

4: Focus on love. Consider whether each couple or person on your list would truly love your children if appointed their guardian. If they have children of their own, will your children be relegated behind their own children? Or is the couple or person sufficiently loving that they will make your children feel loved no matter what?

5: Consider values and philosophies. Ask yourself which people on your list most closely share your values and philosophies with respect to your:

•child-rearing philosophy
•educational values
•social values
•religious beliefs
•moral values

6: Personality counts. Consider whether each of your candidates has the personality traits that would work for your children.

•Are they loving? •Are they good role models?

•Do they have the patience to take on parenting your children?

•How affectionate are they? (If your family is particularly affectionate, a guardian who is loving but not physically affectionate could be damaging.)

•If they're fairly young, how mature are they?

7: Consider practical factors. For example:

•How would raising children fit into their lifestyle?

•If they’re older, do they have the necessary health and stamina? Do they really want to be parents of a young child at their stage in life?

•Do they have other children? How would your children get along with theirs? Are there potential problems if your children were to live with theirs? How easily could the problems be dealt with? (For instance, do you want to place a child who struggles in school with a high-achieving child of the same age for whom everything comes easily?)

•How close do they live to other important people in your children’s lives?

•If a couple divorced, or one person died, would you be comfortable with either of them acting as the sole guardian? If not, you need to specify what you would want to happen.

8: Look for a good – but not a perfect – choice. Most likely, no one on your list will seem perfect – that is, just like you. But if you truly consider what matters to you most, you will probably be able to make some reasonable choices. In the end, trust your instincts.

If one couple or person meets all of your criteria, but doesn’t feel right, don’t choose them. By the same token, if someone feels much more right than any of the others on your list, there’s a good reason for it. Make your primary choice, then some backup choices. It’s essential that both you and your spouse agree. If you cannot make a decision, or if you and your spouse cannot agree, an experienced counseling-based estate planning attorney can help you through the process.

9: Select a temporary as well as a permanent guardian. Temporary guardians may be appointed if both parents become temporarily unable to care for their children – for example, as the result of a car accident. Depending on your choice for permanent guardians, you may want to designate different people to act as temporary guardians.

If your choice for a permanent guardian lives a considerable distance away, choose someone close by to serve as temporary guardian. If you're temporarily disabled, you'll want your children close by. And you won't want their lives unnecessarily disrupted by moving them to a new town and school. If you have no relatives or close friends nearby, consider families of your children’s friends.

10: Consider a Guardianship Panel. Because it's difficult to predict what your children’s needs will be as they grow older, consider appointing a “Guardianship Panel” to decide who would be the best guardian when and if it becomes necessary. Choose trusted relatives and friends to make up the panel. This allows for maximum flexibility, so the most appropriate choice can be made at the time a guardian is actually needed. The Panel can consult with your children and assess their needs and desires to make the most appropriate choice based on the current situation.

11: Write down your reasons. If you’ve chosen friends over relatives, or a more distant relative over a closer one, be sure to explain your decision in writing. That way – in the unlikely event your choice is challenged by people who feel they should have been chosen – a court should readily uphold your decision, knowing you've made your choice for good, solid reasons.

12: Talk with everyone involved. If your children are old enough, talk with them to get their input as well. And be sure to confer with the people you'd like to choose, to ensure they're willing to be chosen and would feel comfortable acting as guardians.

13: Once you’ve made your choice, take steps to make sure the potential guardians you’ve chosen will have guidance and support they need. One idea is to create a set of guidelines to convey information about your children, your parenting values and your hopes and dreams for your children.

14: Set up a trust that will hold the assets you pass to your children, and instruct the trustee to provide necessary financial assistance to the guardians. You can also create specific instructions about special things you’d like the trust funds used for (for example, annual trips for your children to visit close friends and relatives, a particular summer camp, putting in a swimming pool at the guardians’ house).

15: Designate “mentors” consisting of special people in your children’s lives to help guide them in ways for which the “mentor” is particularly well-suited. For instance, the person you choose for trustee may also be a good “financial” or "educational" mentor for your children. Or you may want to designate a “spiritual” mentor, particularly if the guardians you choose have religious philosophies that differ from yours. You can also name in your estate planning documents people who you simply want to have ongoing involvement in your children’s lives. This can be a good way to include both sides of the family.

Posted by Henry (Hank) J. Moravec, III, a partner at Moravec, Varga & Mooney. For a complimentary 30 minute consultation (telephonic or in person), you can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210 or (818) 769-4221.

Mr. Moravec is a very experienced Los Angeles estate planning attorney, Los Angeles trust attorney and Los Angeles guardianship attorney. He has more than 20 years' experience in estate planning and is extremely dedicated to his clients and helping them create a plan that is tailored to their wishes, finances, helps avoid probate and taxes, and takes into account their families' unique situation.

He focuses his practice on Estate Planning, Trust and Probate Administration, Beneficiary and Trustee Representation, Probate Litigation, Tax Law, Guardianship and Nonprofit Law. He represents clients throughout Southern California and his offices are conveniently located for clients in the Los Angeles, Orange, Santa Barbara, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties.

The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/. The firm has two offices and consultations and meetings can be held at either office.

The San Gabriel Valley office is located at 2233 Huntington Drive, Suite 17, San Marino, California 91108. Telephone: (626) 793-3210.

The San Fernando Valley office is located at 4605 Lankershim Boulevard, Suite 718, North Hollywood, California 91602-1878. Telephone: (818) 769-4221.


Friday, December 4, 2009

House Bill Extends Current Estate Tax - Will Legislation Make It Through Senate?


With a year-end deadline approaching, the House moved to prevent a repeal of the estate tax from taking place next year, voting instead to approve a permanent extension of the current levy.

But the legislation may not make it through the Senate. That means the tax could lapse entirely next year, based on the provisions of Bush-era legislation.

The House bill exempts the first $3.5 million of an estate, or $7 million for married couples, and taxes inherited wealth above that at 45%, the same as the 2009 rate. It passed by a vote of 225 to 200, largely along party lines, with most Democrats in favor and Republicans in opposition.

If the legislation isn't completed before January 1, the estate tax would vanish in 2010, which is how the Bush-era tax cuts were designed to work. If the matter remained unaddressed, the tax would return in 2011 at the old Clinton-era rate of 55%.

In 2001, when the current law was adopted, Republican demands for a permanent repeal were beaten back by concerns over the deficit, forcing them to settle for a one-year repeal instead. This is why we are facing this issue now.

As an estate planner, I do not like the potential for wild swings in tax rates. A permanent resolution of this tax issue by the House would allow families and business owners to plan with certainty rather than this unusual and unpredictable tax policy that has been in effect since 2001.

Posted by Henry Moravec, III. Should you have any questions regarding your own situation, you can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210. The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/