Owners Of Businesses Should Consider Creating A Succession Plan: Don't Let Your Business Become An Orphan

The New York Times recently had a guest article entitled "Is My Family Business Going To Be An Orphan?" written by an entrepreneur who owns five businesses. It is insightful  since the writer held a meeting with his family to discuss succession and shares his experience.


The general school of thought is that  small business owners and professional businesses should start succession planning 5 to 10 years before the anticipated transition. We also want clients to consider what happens if if they become disabled or pass away before that time. Does anyone want their business to be passed through a will (not recommended) or without one?


Why does this important business plan get delayed? Many business owners are so focused on day-to-day business operations that they fail to invest the time to develop a succession strategy. Each company is different but we like to ask some basic questions to help clients focus on their goals: Is most of the client's estate tied up in the business? Is there a spouse or children to support after the owner's death or disability? Are there any family members working in the business? Does the business require special licensure to own and operate the business (medical practice for example)?


When we meet with business owners, we combine estate planning with corporate and financial considerations so that the client can consider all options. Options can include selling, transitioning to a family member or business partner, or dissolving the business. Many complex issues should be evaluated during succession planning before coming to a decision because each business is different.


Posted by Henry (Hank) J. Moravec, III, a partner at Moravec, Varga and Mooney. For a complimentary 30 minute consultation (telephonic or in person), you can email Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210. The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com

Trust Administrator Charged With Grand Theft, Perjury and Forgery In Ventura County California

We see numerous cases where there are allegations of wrongdoing in the administration of estates, however, a recent case turned criminal. On February 13, 2012, the Ventura County District Attorney's Office arrested Geoffrey Charles Sjostrom (DOB 09-25-1954), of Simi Valley, and charged him with nine felony charges, including grand theft, perjury, forgery, and the aggravated white collar crime enhancement. His bail was initially set at $200,000.

The criminal complaint alleges that Mr. Sjostrom was a friend of Francis J. Copland, who died in 2005. Before Mr. Copland died, he prepared a trust and a will, naming Mr. Sjostrom to administer both. In his estate documents, Mr. Copland left all of his property to family members. After Mr. Copland's death, Mr. Sjostrom failed to probate Mr. Copland's will and failed to properly account for Mr. Copland's trust property.

The probate court removed Mr. Sjostrom as trustee and ordered him to account for Mr. Copland's property. At that point, Mr. Sjostrom allegedly filed a sworn declaration claiming Mr. Copland had exhausted his bank accounts when he died. A successor trustee was appointed and discovered this information was false. The successor trustee found that Mr. Copland had money in various accounts when he died and that then trustee Mr. Sjostrom methodically took more than $250,000 from those accounts by means of check and ATM withdrawals. If convicted of all charges Sjostrom faces up to 11 years in state prison.

Thus, apart from the fiduciary duties that administrators have to beneficiaries and the estate, it is critical to remember that basic criminal law can come in play if there is misappropriation of funds or pleadings filed under the penalty of perjury.

Posted by Henry (Hank) J. Moravec, III, a partner at Moravec, Varga & Mooney, A Partnership. For a free 30 minute consultation (telephonic or in person), you can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210 or (818) 769-4221.

The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/. The firm has two offices and consultations and meetings can be held at either office.

The San Gabriel Valley office is located at 2233 Huntington Drive, Suite 17, San Marino, California 91108. There is ample free parking adjacent to the firm's office.

The San Fernando Valley office is located at 4605 Lankershim Boulevard, Suite 718, North Hollywood, California 91602-1878.

In Estate Planning, Making Plans For Prized Collections

The New York Times has an article "Making Plans For Collections, Heartstrings Included" about what happens to collections (art, comic books, marbles, Christmas villages, antiques, etc.) when someone dies.

Money is relatively easy to divide up but how does a collector decide what to do his or her prized collection that it has taken years to amass and reflects a passion that may not be shared by the heirs? The collection may also be hard to value.

The article shares the options available to collectors:

(1) Selling the collection before one's passing;

(2) Passing on the collection and keeping it in the family by using methods such as the annual gift exclusion of $13,000 or creating a trust to protect the collection from creditors;

(3) Giving it away to museums or charities depending on the collection; or

(4) Creating a charitable remainder trust which is especially useful for collectibles that are taxed at a 28% rate.

The real point of the article though is that it is not simply the value of these collections but the emotions that are involved in them that create the issues in deciding what to do with them in estate planning. This is why planning is key even though it is something that is simple to put off. It is typical to put estate planning off but a good way to get around the emotions is to hire an estate planner, schedule meetings and create an outside structure that requires one to address the issues -- emotional or not -- that typically arise during estate planning.

Posted by Henry (Hank) J. Moravec, III, a partner at Moravec, Varga & Mooney. For a complimentary 30 minute consultation (telephonic or in person), you can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210 or (818) 769-4221.

Five Tips for Trustees

We represent trustees and being a trustee is a job with tremendous responsibility. Since trusts have become popular estate planning tools, we have seen numerous instances where they are traps for the uninformed trustee. The trust has specific wishes and demands and expects that they will closely followed, and it is the trustee's duty to make sure that happens.

Being a trustee can be a thankless job. It can subject even the most honest person with good intentions to litigation. If you are asked to serve as trustee, weigh your decision carefully since a trustee's duties may become complicated and mired in disputes.

Here are tips that we give our trustee clients:

1. Read the trust with the aid of a trust attorney. Since the trustee is required to administer the trust according to its terms, reading all the terms of the trust and understanding the terms is important. Not all trusts are the same and in many cases it is important that the trustee read the document carefully and be assisted by an attorney familiar with trust administrations.

2. Provide annual accountings. Certain trusts are specific as to what the trustee may receive as compensation (for example, a fixed fee or a percentage of the value of the assets). But some trusts only provide for "reasonable compensation" to be paid to the trustee which can mean different things to different people. To avoid problems, keep track of the hours you spend on trust-related duties. If there is a dispute regarding compensation, be prepared to show the actual amount of time devoted to trust matters.

California Probate Code Section 16062 requires a trustee to provide the beneficiaries with annual accountings that explain the trust's income and expenses. Once the accounting is finished, serve it on the beneficiaries immediately since service triggers the three-year statute of limitations. For example, if a trustee does not serve the accounting, the statute of limitations for filing a challenge will not begin to run.

3. Track inventory. Do not assume the trust is in effect because the documents have been signed. Make sure the assets in questions were actually transferred into the trust and vested in the name of the trustee. If this has not been done, exercise best efforts to bring the trust's assets in to the trust as soon as possible. Locate all potential trust assets, and determine whether any that have not yet been transferred to the trust can still be included.

4. Get good legal advice and insurance. The best protection against a potential lawsuit is to get good legal advice and to purchase an insurance policy covering errors and omissions. Without insurance coverage, a trustee's personal assets could be at risk if an unhappy beneficiary files a lawsuit.

5. Remain neutral. Lawyers such as myself who are asked to serve as trustees are often caught in the middle. On the one hand, I will serve the trustee's interest as set forth in the trust instrument. On the other hand, I must pay attention to the interests of the beneficiaries who probably include close family and friends of the trustee. The same applies to laypersons who serve in this capacity.

The trustee's actions will be watched and possibly challenged by any beneficiary who feels he or she was treated unfairly.

There is an exception to the need to remain neutral and that is when the trust is revocable (such as while the settlor is still alive). In that situation, the trustee's duty is to the settlor and not the remainder beneficiaries; the trustee should act only in the settlor's best interest. Estateof Giraldin, 199 Cal.App.4th 577 (2011).

If you are the trustee, it may not be possible to avoid litigation but if you follow these tips it will help you avoid litigation traps. If you are a trustee and need legal advice on how to fulfill your duties, feel free to contact us.

Posted by Henry (Hank) J. Moravec, III, a partner at Moravec, Varga & Mooney, A Partnership.
For a complimentary 30 minute consultation (telephonic or in person), you can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210 or (818) 769-4221.
The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/.

The San Gabriel Valley office is located at 2233 Huntington Drive, Suite 17, San Marino, California 91108.

What Is Undue Influence In California Probate Courts?

As a law firm that focuses on probate and estate and trust litigation, we are seeing an increase in the number of allegations of undue influence in our cases. What do you do if you think a loved one is the victim of undue influence? Or what do you do if you are accused of exercising undue influence? Or what can you do to help prevent allegations of undue influence in the future?

Claims of undue influence can be difficult to understand and prove, both because of the lack of a definition in the Probate Code and because it occurs behind closed doors without witnesses. Increasingly, though, probate courts have staff such as investigators or visitors who go out and interview proposed conservatees and determine their circumstances, including the presence of apparent undue influence. Probate courts are also receiving more information from community practitioners such as Adult Protective Services social workers, physicians, and hospital discharge planners.

In California, the definition of undue influence is contained in California Civil Code §1575. This statute was enacted in 1872, a date which calls into question its application in the 21st century. Thus, probate judges in California lack probate statutory support when they must consider imposing a conservatorship on an elder who is allegedly being victimized by someone using undue influence. Additionally, we see that cases are not always handled consistently.

Complicating the picture is traditional thinking that mental capacity and undue influence are intrinsically linked. In other words, undue influence occurs only if there are deficits in mental functioning. Even though California law is clear that soundness of mind and body does not imply immunity from undue influence, the perception that undue influence cannot exist without mental deficits persists. Thus, if your loved one does not have mental deficits it may be more difficult to prove undue influence.

The first and most commonly invoked statute regarding undue influence is California Civil Code §1575, which was enacted in 1872 and is commonly cited as a definition of undue influence. The elements are:

1. The use, by one in whom a confidence is reposed by another, or who holds real or apparent authority over him, of such confidence or authority for the purpose of obtaining an unfair advantage over him;

2. In taking an unfair advantage of another’s weakness of mind; and

3. In taking a grossly oppressive and unfair advantage of another’s necessities or distress.

Pressure of some type is always a part of undue influence situations. In a seminal California case, Odorizzi v Bloomfield, undue influence was used against a person who was not an elder and had mental capacity. The court cited factors that indicated excessive pressure:

1. Discussion of the transaction at an unusual or inappropriate time;

2. Consummation of the transaction in an unusual place;

3. Insistent demand that the business be finished at once;

4. Extreme emphasis on the untoward consequences of the delay;

5. Use of multiple persuaders by the dominant side against a servient party; and

6. Absence of third-party advisors

More recent law is contained in California Welfare and Institutions Code §15610.30 et seq., which address financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult. In 2009, that section and others in the Welfare and Institutions Code were amended. The term u"ndue influence" was added. Section 15610.30(3) of the California Welfare and Institutions Code now states that financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult occurs when a person or entity does any of the

following:

“Takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains, or retains, or assists in taking, secreting, appropriate, obtaining, or retaining, real, or personal property of an elder or dependent adult when the elder or dependent adult lacks capacity pursuant to Probate Code §812, or by undue influence, as defined in Civil Code §1575, or both.”

Thus, undue influence is legally related to financial abuse. Section 15657.6 of the Welfare and Institutions Code—which references an elder lacking capacity (pursuant to California Probate Code §812) or being of unsound mind, but not entirely without understanding—states that a person or entity must return real or personal property if the elder or the elder’s representative demands it. Failure to do so in a timely fashion subjects the perpetrator to the same remedies available for financial abuse, namely, damages, attorney’s fees, and costs.

Although the California Probate Code does not contain a definition of undue influence, it does contain specific information as to determining deficits in mental functions in §811 and the capacity to make decisions in §812.

What do you do with this information regarding undue influence? If you or your loved one are in the planning stage, it may be wise to take steps to avoid such allegations in the future by involving an experienced attorney to guide you through the process. If you suspect undue influence, before you jump to allegations consult an attorney so you can make an objective assessment of whether you can prove your case. Probation litigation can be costly and a case should be evaluated by an objective attorney before you decide on a course of action. As our population ages, we can expect to see an increase in undue influence allegations in probate court.

Posted by Henry (Hank) J. Moravec, III, a partner at Moravec, Varga & Mooney, A Partnership. For a free 30 minute consultation (telephonic or in person), you can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210 or (818) 769-4221.

With respect to probate, Hank Moravec has over 20 years' experience as one of the best Los Angeles probate attorneys and Los Angeles probate litigation attorneys and is available should you need legal advice regarding your own or a family member's situation. For a consultation, You can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210 or (818) to request a consultation.

The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/. The firm has two offices and consultations and meetings can be held at either office.

The San Gabriel Valley office is located at 2233 Huntington Drive, Suite 17, San Marino, California 91108. There is ample free parking adjacent to the firm's office.

Legal Skirmishes Over Heiress Huguette Clark's $400-Million Estate Comes Down To A Battle of Wills — Two of Them.

Estate and probate lawyers a battle taking place in New York regarding the Estate of Huguette Clark. Huguette Clark, who had significant California property, died at the age of 104 in May 2011 in the New York City hospital where she had lived for at least 20 years. An MSNBC investigation also plays a role in this case. Her estate is estimated to be worth over $400 million.

In her 2005 will, she left large sums to a few people — including about $34 million to her nurse caretaker of 20 years — and asked that her Santa Barbara mansion be turned into an art museum. On Monday, however, a second will surfaced in court documents. It was signed just six weeks before the will that was previously made public and didn't mention anything about a museum. Instead, it left everything to 21 distant relatives who are now accusing Clark's longtime attorney and accountant of "plundering" her holdings.

That's a marked contrast from the later will, which specified that no money go to her family members, with whom she had "minimum contacts" over the years. What caused such a dramatic change of heart in such a short period is unknown. But in a filing with New York Surrogate's Court, the relatives' attorney, John R. Morken, wrote of "alleged deceit, undue influence and exploitation of a very elderly and extraordinarily wealthy woman at the hands of two professionals who, with the help of certain others, took control of her life, isolated her from family, and ultimately stripped her of her free will, as well as millions of dollars."

A group of family members made the same charges last year but failed to convince a New York judge that attorney Wallace Bock and accountant Irving H. Kamsler were helping themselves to Clark's fortune. However, after a series of reports on msnbc.com, New York prosecutors opened an investigation that is ongoing, according to Morken. Attorneys for both men have said they did nothing wrong and always acted in Clark's best interest.

But relatives, who said Bock kept them from visiting their great-aunt, were skeptical — and not just for financial reasons, according to Morken. "Even of greater concern to them is the family's heritage," he wrote. Huguette Clark's father was copper baron and former Montana Sen. William Andrews Clark. She grew up in privilege and at her death still owned apartments in one of Fifth Avenue's most elegant buildings, a large home in Connecticut, artworks that included a painting from Monet's "Water Lilies" series, a collection of French dolls, and a 23-acre bluff-top estate in Santa Barbara called Bellosguardo —Italian for "beautiful view."

By all accounts, it had been at least 50 years since she last set foot in Bellosguardo, a home with formal gardens that was maintained by a live-in manager. In her more recent will, she directed that a foundation be set up to run the new museum, with Bock and Kamsler operating it. That arrangement, the relatives said Monday, would allow the pair unfettered access to much of Clark's fortune. Even as Clark's executors, the men would make more than $20 million in commissions, according to Morken. Clark outlived her six brothers and sisters. She was divorced in 1930 and had no children.

Settlement of the conflict over her estate is expected to take several years. Although most estates are not worth this amount, once family disputes occur and litigation begins, it can take anywhere from months to years to settle all the claims. The trust will have its own attorney, the beneficiaries will have their attorneys, and the relatives presenting the second will and challenging the first will also have a set of attorneys. And what happens if the beneficiaries do not agree? More delays. Probate litigation is a very sensitive type of litigation and the emotions tend to run high.

Posted by Henry (Hank) J. Moravec, III, a partner at Moravec, Varga & Mooney, A Partnership. For a free 30 minute consultation (telephonic or in person) regarding your own situation, you can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210 or (818) 769-4221.

With respect to probate, Hank Moravec has over 20 years' experience as one of the best Los Angeles probate attorneys and Los Angeles probate litigation attorneys and is available should you need legal advice regarding your own or a family member's situation. For a consultation, You can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210 or (818) 769-4221 to request a consultation.

The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/. The firm has two offices and consultations and meetings can be held at either office.

The San Gabriel Valley office is located at 2233 Huntington Drive, Suite 17, San Marino, California 91108. There is ample free parking adjacent to the firm's office.

The San Fernando Valley office is located at 4605 Lankershim Boulevard, Suite 718, North Hollywood, California 91602-1878.

ABLE Bill Creating Tax-free Savings Accounts to Supplement Special Needs Trusts Is Expected To Pass This Year

Parents raising children with disabilities, including autism and Down's Syndrome, could soon save for their futures with tax-free “529″ savings accounts without jeopardizing their eligibility for other benefits.

The new accounts would be authorized under the Achieving a Better Life Experience (ABLE) Act of 2011 (H.R. 3423), which was introduced on November 15, 2011 in Congress with the support of Autism Speaks, The Arc, the National Down Syndrome Society and a host of other disability rights groups. The bill appears to have bipartisan support.

The ABLE Act, sponsored with bi-partisan support in the House by Congressman Ander Crenshaw (R-FL) and Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA), and in the Senate by Senators Robert Casey, Jr. (D-PA) and Richard Burr (R-NC), would amend Section 529 of the Internal Revenue Service Code to allow individuals with disabilities and their families to deposit earnings to tax-exempt savings accounts.

The funds could be used to pay for qualified expenses, including education, housing and transportation, and would supplement, not replace, benefits provided through private insurance, employment or public programs.

Qualified disability expenses would include: school tuition and related educational materials; expenses for securing and maintaining a primary residence; transportation; employment supports; health prevention and wellness costs; assistive technology and personal support; and various miscellaneous expenses associated with independent living.

Currently, there are few options for families to save money for those with disabilities who often cannot have more than $2,000 to their name without forfeiting many government benefits. One existing option that our office specializes in is the "Special Needs Trust," which allows families to set money aside for the benefit of a person with a disability under the care of a trustee. An ABLE account would operate more like a bank account and would be less involved than a Special Needs Trust.

Special Needs Trusts will remain important tools in planning for the disabled especially since ABLE will have significant limitations once those accounts reach $100,000 (for example, disqualifying a disabled person from receiving SSI).

Posted by Henry (Hank) J. Moravec, III, a partner at Moravec, Varga & Mooney, A Partnership. For a free 30 minute consultation (telephonic or in person), you can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him at (626) 793-3210 or (818) 769-4221.

With respect to tax and estate law issues, Hank Moravec has over 20 years' experience as one of the best Los Angeles estate and trust tax attorneys and Los Angeles Special Needs Trust attorneys and is available should you need legal advice regarding your own or a family member's situation. For a consultation, You can e-mail Hank Moravec at hm@moravecslaw.com or call him to request a consultation.

The firm website is http://www.moravecslaw.com/. The firm has two offices and consultations and meetings can be held at either office. We can also arrange to have consultations at your home or office.

The San Gabriel Valley office is located at 2233 Huntington Drive, Suite 17, San Marino, California 91108. There is ample free parking adjacent to the firm's office. Call (626) 793-3210.

The San Fernando Valley office is located at 4605 Lankershim Boulevard, Suite 718, North Hollywood, California 91602-1878. Call